Apr 1, 2018-2018
Sri Lanka
Peace Flotilla to Home for Displaced Persons in Sri Lanka
Share
ACTIVISTS/ACT.GROUPS/DESCRIPTION OF THE GROUP
Displaced Citizens of Iranaitheevu; Various Activists, Journalists, and Clergy; Iranaitheevu Women’s Development Society (WDS)
TARGET
Government of Sri Lanka; Sri Lankan Navy
WIDELY HELD BELIEF
Sri Lankan Navy should vacate their land and restore the proper economic and human rights for those they displaced.
CASE NARRATIVE
Issue and Opponent: Sri Lanka’s civil war, which was fought between the majority Sinhala-dominated government and a minority separatist group, the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam, or LTTE, engulfed the island of Iranaitheevu in 1992, forcing all 650 of its residents to flee to the mainland. They spent the next 17 years in a state of constant displacement, relocating to different areas in northern Sri Lanka to avoid the fighting. The war ended in 2009 after the government implemented a scorched earth policy. It bombed hospitals, aid distributions, and no-fire zones in LTTE territory to secure a military victory. The LTTE, meanwhile, refused to allow civilians to flee, in a futile effort to use them as human shields. The Iranaitheevu community was among the 350,000 civilians caught in the middle. After the war ended the government detained the Iranaitheevu community and the rest of the surviving civilian population in overcrowded displacement camps, wherewith human rights violations occurred, including sexual violence and torture. When the government released the Iranaitheevu community members from the camps six months later, they expected to finally return home. Instead, they found the navy was still occupying their island and had no plans to leave. Dilemma Action: In April 2018, a flotilla of 44 motorboats filled with 300 Sri Lankan Tamils and a small group of activists, journalists, and clergy led by a group of women known as the Iranaitheevu Women’s Development Society (WDS), ignored the navy’s explicit orders and set sail for their former homes on the navy-occupied island of Iranaitheevu. To ensure the navy couldn’t justify an attack on the pretense of self-defense, they tied white flags to each motorboat, signaling they were unarmed. Unprepared to respond, the navy officers retreated, saying they would have to consult senior navy officials. Outcome: The navy never made any subsequent attempts to expel the Iranaitheevu people from the island. The government granted the community official permission to remain, giving up its quarter-century campaign to keep them from their land. Three months later, 100 community members permanently moved back to the island.
PRIMARY STRUGGLE/GOAL
NONVIOLENT TACTICS USED
DA TACTICS USED
Social disobedience
CASE NARRATIVE WRITER
SUCCESS METRICS
10 / 12
(CONC) Concessions were made
(EREP) Dilemma action got replicated by other movements
(MC) Media Coverage
(MSYMP) Media coverage was sympathetic to the activists
(OR) Opponent response
(PS) Dilemma action built sympathy with the public
(PUN) Punishment favored the activists
(REFR) Dilemma action reframed the narrative of the opponent
(RF) Dilemma action reduced fear and/or apathy among the activists
(SA) Dilemma action appealed to a broad segment of the public
PART OF A LARGER CAMPAIGN
0 / 3
RESOURCES
Project documentation
Dilemma Actions Coding Guidebook
Case study documentation
Dilemma_Actions_Analysis_Dataset
SOURCES
Fuller, Lisa. 2018. “How women led a peaceful flotilla to reclaim their island from the Sri Lankan Navy,” Waging Nonviolence, July 31. Retrieved July 23, 2023. (https://wagingnonviolence.org/2018/07/iranaitheevu-women-reclaim-island-sri-lanka-navy/).
Related cases
Nov 11, 2006-2006
United States of America
In 2006, Jacques Servin and Igor Vamos of the activist duo Yes Men sought to reveal how the free trade policies of the World Trade Organization (WTO) reflected systemi...
/
Dec 19, 2019-2019
India
Issue and Opposition: PM Modi and his party (BJP) are accused of being right-wing Hindu conservatives nurturing anti-Muslim sentiments and formulating anti-Muslim poli...
/
Mar 30, 2012-2012
United States of America
The Heartland Institute is considered a pseudo-think. It is the leading denier of global warming and is often cited by conservative politicians. The Heartland Institut...
/
Subscribe to our newsletters to get full access to all materials on our website.